How FCC Mobile Net Neutrality Stance Pushed AT&T, Verizon to Open Networks
Further developments in the mobile network neutrality battle: AT&T's, Verizon's Mobile VoIP Moves Reveal Political Concerns.
The central argument in the current network neutrality debate is whether there should be laws or regulations forcing Internet service providers (ISPs) to treat all traffic equally – in practical terms, it means not delaying or degrading the performance of services that compete with the ISPs' own services. There are actually two parts to this argument. One is the question of whether ISPs should treat all traffic equally. The other is whether the government should be telling ISPs how to run their networks, a complex task requiring enormous understanding of subtle technical and commercial issues. Network neutrality proponents focus on the first argument, ISPs on the second.
Focusing on the combined argument -- whether the government should actually mandate network neutrality -- is in fact a formula for frustration. It almost guarantees that the debate get bogged down in ideological battles. It also ensures that every technical advance necessitates a redefinition of what should and shouldn't be allowed. But there's a much simpler solution that would ultimately work better: to require the separation of the ISPs' transport and services functions.
Continue reading "A Simple Solution to the Network Neutrality Problem" »
